Guide4 min read

Doc­u­ments and appeals

How to report a crime and check whether it was entered in the Unified Register of Pre-trial Investigations

After re­port­ing a pos­si­ble crime, the de­ci­sive point is often not the date on your copy but proof of when the au­thor­i­ty re­ceived it. For Kyiv and the region, this guide ex­plains how to prepare the report, doc­u­ment its ac­cep­tance, and track the next 24 hours.

Legal dossier prepared for reading the guide
Current
Sep­tem­ber 13, 2026
Reading
4 min
Focus
Kyiv
Briefly

What you should know

  • De­scribe the spe­cif­ic facts, time, place, pos­si­ble par­tic­i­pants, and avail­able ev­i­dence; you do not need to es­tab­lish the legal clas­si­fi­ca­tion your­self.
  • Keep a copy of the report and its at­tach­ments, to­geth­er with proof of exactly when the au­thor­i­ty re­ceived it: a stamp, ticket, or elec­tron­ic/postal con­fir­ma­tion.
  • Under Article 214 of the CPC, in­for­ma­tion must be entered in the ERDR im­me­di­ate­ly and no later than 24 hours; the extract is pro­vid­ed within a sep­a­rate 24 hours after entry.
  • If in­for­ma­tion has not been entered, the next pro­ce­dur­al step is a sep­a­rate com­plaint to the in­ves­ti­gat­ing judge, not another general appeal.

When this is needed

This guide is for re­port­ing facts that may con­sti­tute a crim­i­nal offence and keeping a ver­i­fi­able record of sub­mis­sion. For example, after paying for a nonex­is­tent product in Kyiv, pre­serve not only the cor­re­spon­dence and payment record but also a copy of the report and proof of when the police re­ceived it. If there is an im­me­di­ate danger to life or health, seek emer­gency as­sis­tance first rather than waiting for a written pro­ce­dure.

Not every breach of con­tract is a crime. Sep­a­rate what you know and can sub­stan­ti­ate from as­sump­tions. Au­tho­rized of­fi­cials de­ter­mine the legal clas­si­fi­ca­tion and in­ves­tiga­tive ju­ris­dic­tion.

Which deadline or procedure applies

Under Article 214 of the CPC, a report of a crim­i­nal offence must be ac­cept­ed and reg­is­tered; refusal to accept it is not allowed. An in­ves­ti­ga­tor, inquiry officer, or pros­e­cu­tor enters the in­for­ma­tion in the ERDR im­me­di­ate­ly and no later than 24 hours after sub­mis­sion. For prac­ti­cal ver­i­fi­ca­tion, use proof of actual receipt. The 24-hour cal­cu­la­tor uses local Europe/Kyiv time and ac­counts for clock changes.

After entry, the ap­pli­cant is pro­vid­ed an ERDR extract within a sep­a­rate 24 hours. The absence of an extract alone does not prove that no entry exists: first es­tab­lish whether and when the in­for­ma­tion was entered. During martial law, Article 615 of the CPC pro­vides a special pro­ce­dure only when tech­ni­cal access to the reg­is­ter is un­avail­able; the start of the in­ves­ti­ga­tion is then for­mal­ized by a res­o­lu­tion, and the entry is made at the first op­por­tu­ni­ty.

Steps to take

Prepare a short time­line: dates, place, par­tic­i­pants’ actions, con­se­quences, and wit­ness­es. State which doc­u­ments, pho­tographs, record­ings, or cor­re­spon­dence support each im­por­tant fact. Attach copies and list them. Do not hand over the only orig­i­nals without doc­u­ment­ing that trans­fer.

Submit the report through an avail­able of­fi­cial police or pros­e­cu­tor channel. If you submit it in person in Kyiv or Kyiv Oblast, ask for proof of ac­cep­tance on your copy or another reg­is­tra­tion doc­u­ment showing the date and time. For postal or elec­tron­ic sub­mis­sion, keep the text, at­tach­ments, and proof of de­liv­ery and receipt. Check the au­thor­i­ty and channel against current of­fi­cial in­for­ma­tion; do not choose an address solely based on where you live.

Once receipt is con­firmed, note when the 24 hours expire. If the au­thor­i­ty reports an entry, request an extract and check its key details. If there is no entry, pre­serve the re­sponse or other ev­i­dence. Then use the guide to chal­leng­ing pro­ce­dur­al in­ac­tion and sep­a­rate­ly check the com­plaint dead­line under Ar­ti­cles 303–304 of the CPC.

What to check before submitting

Compare the facts and at­tach­ments: do they show a pos­si­ble un­law­ful event, rather than only a final demand to return money? Include a contact method for re­ceiv­ing the extract and notices. Check that the at­tach­ments listed on your copy match the ma­te­ri­als ac­tu­al­ly sub­mit­ted.

Do not mix a CPC report with an or­di­nary appeal to the pros­e­cu­tor’s office. A general com­plaint or request that does not report a pos­si­ble crime follows the sep­a­rate appeal pro­ce­dure. If you need an ex­ist­ing doc­u­ment from an au­thor­i­ty, an in­for­ma­tion request may be ap­pro­pri­ate instead.

When to consult a lawyer

Legal as­sis­tance can help when an event in­volves both crim­i­nal and civil issues, the au­thor­i­ty does not confirm receipt, in­for­ma­tion has not been entered, or you need to iden­ti­fy the next pro­ce­dur­al step quickly. For Kyiv and the region, a lawyer can review the factual time­line, ev­i­dence package, and au­thor­i­ty that re­ceived the report, without promis­ing a par­tic­u­lar in­ves­ti­ga­tion outcome.

Documents

What to prepare

  • The report text with your name, contact details, factual cir­cum­stances, place, time, and pos­si­ble wit­ness­es.
  • Copies of pho­tographs, cor­re­spon­dence, payment doc­u­ments, or other ma­te­ri­als with a brief at­tach­ment list; keep the orig­i­nals.
  • A copy of the sub­mit­ted report and ac­cep­tance stamp, ticket, in­com­ing number, postal in­ven­to­ry, or elec­tron­ic con­fir­ma­tion of receipt.
  • An ERDR extract or cor­re­spon­dence about its pro­vi­sion, if the in­for­ma­tion has already been entered.
Risks

Common mistakes

  • Sending only a general com­plaint without de­scrib­ing facts that may in­di­cate a crim­i­nal offence.
  • Handing over orig­i­nal ev­i­dence without copies or a list of the ma­te­ri­als pro­vid­ed.
  • Count­ing 24 hours from writing or sending the report without proof that it was re­ceived.
  • Con­fus­ing the 24 hours for en­ter­ing in­for­ma­tion with the fol­low­ing 24 hours for pro­vid­ing the extract.
  • As­sum­ing that martial law by itself au­to­mat­i­cal­ly sus­pends the duty to enter in­for­ma­tion in the ERDR.

Official sources

  • Crim­i­nal Pro­ce­dure Code of UkraineArticle 214 governs receipt of reports, entry in the ERDR, and pro­vi­sion of an extract; Ar­ti­cles 303–304 es­tab­lish a sep­a­rate chal­lenge pro­ce­dure; Article 615 pro­vides an ex­cep­tion when tech­ni­cal access to the reg­is­ter is un­avail­able.
Prepared
This ma­te­r­i­al was pre­pared for the website’s ref­er­ence section based on of­fi­cial sources.
Control
Before pub­li­ca­tion, the editors check legal state­ments against the cited of­fi­cial sources and the date they were current.
Important
This guide is in­for­ma­tion­al. A de­ci­sion re­quires review of the doc­u­ments, dead­lines, and factual cir­cum­stances.

Current as of . The ma­te­r­i­al depends on the doc­u­ments and cir­cum­stances of the spe­cif­ic case.

Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Can the authority refuse to accept a report of a criminal offence?

Article 214 of the CPC pro­hibits re­fus­ing to accept and reg­is­ter a report. If ac­cep­tance is dis­put­ed, doc­u­ment the date, sub­mis­sion method, and avail­able ev­i­dence.

Do I need to cite a specific article of the Criminal Code?

The im­por­tant points for the ap­pli­cant are the facts: what hap­pened, where and when, who can confirm it, and what ev­i­dence exists. The au­tho­rized of­fi­cials de­ter­mine the legal clas­si­fi­ca­tion; you do not need to invent one.

When can I expect an ERDR extract?

The ap­pli­cant is pro­vid­ed an ERDR extract within 24 hours after the in­for­ma­tion is entered. This is a sep­a­rate period and does not extend the first 24 hours for entry.

What should I do if there is no entry in the ERDR?

First check proof that the report was re­ceived and the rel­e­vant time­line. Failure to enter in­for­ma­tion after a report may be chal­lenged before an in­ves­ti­gat­ing judge under Article 303 of the CPC; check the com­plaint dead­line and scope sep­a­rate­ly.

Does martial law change the procedure?

Article 615 of the CPC pro­vides a special pro­ce­dure when tech­ni­cal access to the ERDR is un­avail­able: the de­ci­sion to com­mence an in­ves­ti­ga­tion is for­mal­ized by a res­o­lu­tion, and the in­for­ma­tion is entered at the first op­por­tu­ni­ty. Martial law alone is not enough to reach that con­clu­sion.

Free initial con­sul­ta­tion

Need help with: Report of a criminal offence?

Briefly de­scribe the sit­u­a­tion. We will check which doc­u­ments and dead­lines are crit­i­cal in your case.

  • a phone number or brief de­scrip­tion is enough
  • after the first contact, the next step should be clear
  • the form uses the same request sub­mis­sion route