Cal­cu­la­torpre­lim­i­nary cal­cu­la­tion

Legal as­sis­tance costs

Calculator for allocation of legal assistance costs

Enter the value of one mon­e­tary claim, the amount awarded and each party’s pro­fes­sion­al legal as­sis­tance costs already de­ter­mined or ac­cept­ed by the court. The tool shows an arith­metic es­ti­mate for a civil case in Kyiv or Kyiv Region, but cannot predict the amount the court will finally set.

Legal workflow with calculations and documents
Current
July 21, 2026
Format
Online
Value
0 ₴
Online tool

Proportional calculation for one monetary claim

Each amount is cal­cu­lat­ed without in­ter­me­di­ate per­cent­age round­ing, then sep­a­rate­ly rounded to the nearest kopeck using the “half up” rule.

Cal­cu­la­tion scope: one mon­e­tary claim in civil pro­ceed­ings, with no coun­ter­claim, non-prop­er­ty, or mixed claims.

Preliminary allocation

Arithmetic estimate
Possible difference12 750,00 UAH

Pos­si­ble di­rec­tion: from de­fen­dant to claimant

Part ten of Article 141 of the Civil Pro­ce­dure Code of Ukraine allows the court to order payment of the dif­fer­ence but does not make it au­to­mat­ic.

Claims granted
62,5%
Claims dismissed
37,5%
In the claimant’s favor before comparison
18 750,00 UAH
In the defendant’s favor before comparison
6 000,00 UAH

Claimant’s amount: 30 000,00 UAH × 125 000,00 UAH / 200 000,00 UAH = 18 750,00 UAH

De­fen­dant’s amount: 16 000,00 UAH × 75 000,00 UAH / 200 000,00 UAH = 6 000,00 UAH

Round­ing: Both amounts are rounded in­de­pen­dent­ly to the nearest kopeck; any dif­fer­ence is de­ter­mined only after that.

Im­por­tant: The court checks the ev­i­dence, its con­nec­tion to the case, whether the costs were real, nec­es­sary, jus­ti­fied, and pro­por­tion­ate. The amount finally ac­cept­ed and al­lo­ca­tion method may differ from this cal­cu­la­tion.

The brief summary is easy to paste into a message to a lawyer or save for your­self.

Complete the full form

How proportional allocation works

If a claim is par­tial­ly granted, other court costs are divided between the parties in pro­por­tion to the granted and re­ject­ed parts of the claims. For this limited cal­cu­la­tion, the claimant’s success is the amount awarded divided by the value of one mon­e­tary claim.

First de­ter­mine sep­a­rate­ly the portion of the claimant’s ac­cept­ed costs at­trib­ut­able to granted claims and the portion of the re­spon­dent’s ac­cept­ed costs at­trib­ut­able to dis­missed claims. The per­cent­ages on screen are ex­plana­to­ry; mon­e­tary amounts are cal­cu­lat­ed di­rect­ly from the hryvnia values in kopecks.

After in­de­pen­dent­ly round­ing both amounts, the cal­cu­la­tor shows their dif­fer­ence and di­rec­tion. This is only a pos­si­ble option under part ten of Article 141 of the Civil Pro­ce­dure Code: the court may order payment of the dif­fer­ence or use another jus­ti­fied al­lo­ca­tion.

Methodology

Calculation methodology

Cal­cu­la­tion method­ol­o­gy

  1. We check that this is one mon­e­tary claim without coun­ter­claims, non-mon­e­tary claims, or mixed claims.
  2. We enter the claim value C and the amount awarded A, where C is greater than zero and A is between 0 and C.
  3. Use claimant’s P and de­fen­dant’s D ex­pens­es ac­cept­ed for al­lo­ca­tion after sep­a­rate­ly check­ing the ev­i­dence and pro­por­tion­al­i­ty.
  4. We cal­cu­late the claimant’s amount as P × A / C and the de­fen­dant’s amount as D × (C − A) / C without round­ing per­cent­ages.
  5. Each amount re­ceived is in­de­pen­dent­ly rounded to the nearest kopeck using the “half up” rule.
  6. Sub­tract the de­fen­dant’s rounded amount from the claimant’s rounded amount and show the pos­si­ble dif­fer­ence and di­rec­tion, without re­plac­ing the court’s de­ci­sion.
Example

Example of partial success on a claim

In a civil case in Kyiv, the value of one mon­e­tary claim is UAH 200,000, and the court awarded UAH 125,000. For al­lo­ca­tion, the claimant’s costs are UAH 30,000 and the de­fen­dant’s costs are UAH 16,000.

  • Claim value C: UAH 200,000
  • Awarded A: UAH 125,000
  • Ac­cept­ed claimant costs P: UAH 30,000
  • Ac­cept­ed de­fen­dant costs D: UAH 16,000

62.5% granted and 37.5% denied. The claimant’s amount for com­par­i­son is UAH 18,750; the de­fen­dant’s is UAH 6,000. The pos­si­ble dif­fer­ence is UAH 12,750 payable by the de­fen­dant to the claimant.

This is an arith­metic example. The court may accept a dif­fer­ent amount of costs after as­sess­ing the ev­i­dence, ne­ces­si­ty, rea­son­able­ness, and pro­por­tion­al­i­ty; payment of the dif­fer­ence under part ten of Article 141 of the Civil Pro­ce­dure Code is not au­to­mat­ic.

Documents

What to prepare for review

  • The claim and cal­cu­la­tion of its value.
  • A court de­ci­sion showing the exact amounts of mon­e­tary claims granted and dis­missed.
  • Legal as­sis­tance agree­ments, fee-term ap­pen­dices, and rep­re­sen­ta­tives’ war­rants for both parties.
  • In­voic­es, reports, payment doc­u­ments, or con­fir­ma­tion of the oblig­a­tion to pay for ser­vices.
  • A de­tailed de­scrip­tion of the work per­formed, time spent, and how the ser­vices relate to the spe­cif­ic case.
  • Ap­pli­ca­tions for court costs, proof they were filed on time, and the other party’s ob­jec­tions to pro­por­tion­al­i­ty.

Official sources

Prepared
The method­ol­o­gy was pre­pared by the website ed­i­to­r­i­al team based on of­fi­cial sources.
Checked
The cal­cu­la­tion has been re­viewed by a lawyer; no per­son­al data was pub­lished.
Important
The tool pro­vides a pre­lim­i­nary result and does not replace doc­u­ment review.

Current as of . The cal­cu­la­tion is pre­lim­i­nary and depends on the doc­u­ments and cir­cum­stances.

Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Which cases is this calculator suitable for?

For one mon­e­tary claim in civil pro­ceed­ings where the claim value, awarded amount, and both parties’ costs ac­cept­ed for al­lo­ca­tion are known. Coun­ter­claims, non-prop­er­ty claims, and mixed claims require sep­a­rate analy­sis.

What amount of legal fees should I enter?

An amount already rec­og­nized by the court, or rea­son­ably used as the base after re­view­ing the con­tract, work de­scrip­tion, in­voic­es, acts, payment, or payment oblig­a­tion. An amount claimed by the parties is not ac­cept­ed au­to­mat­i­cal­ly.

Does a possible difference mean an automatic set-off?

No. Part ten of Article 141 of the Civil Pro­ce­dure Code states that the court may require the party al­lo­cat­ed the greater amount of court costs to pay the dif­fer­ence to the other party. The final al­lo­ca­tion method must be re­flect­ed in the court de­ci­sion.

Why might the amount in the court decision differ?

The court con­sid­ers more than the arith­metic pro­por­tion: it also reviews ev­i­dence, the link between the costs and the case, ne­ces­si­ty, rea­son­able­ness, pro­por­tion­al­i­ty, and the parties’ pro­ce­dur­al conduct.

How does the calculator round kopecks?

The claimant’s and de­fen­dant’s amounts are in­de­pen­dent­ly rounded to the nearest kopeck using the half-up rule. Only then is any dif­fer­ence cal­cu­lat­ed.

Is the success percentage rounded before the calculation?

No. The per­cent­age is shown for ex­pla­na­tion, but each amount is cal­cu­lat­ed di­rect­ly as a share of the claim value without in­ter­me­di­ate per­cent­age round­ing.

Free initial con­sul­ta­tion

Need to check the allocation of court costs?

Submit an ap­pli­ca­tion if you need to check the claim value, amount awarded, proof of ex­pens­es, and pos­si­ble al­lo­ca­tion of costs in a civil case in Kyiv or Kyiv Oblast.

  • the cal­cu­la­tor result can serve as a ref­er­ence for a con­ver­sa­tion
  • doc­u­ments, dead­lines, or con­tract terms may change the con­clu­sion
  • briefly de­scribe the cir­cum­stances in the form if needed